Cast against Type?
(Do you see what I did there?)
Going through the stats for the traffic on this blog when it passed its 5000th hit, I was struck by the fact that Part Three: Setting Type has the least number of views by a substantial margin. If you're working your way through the guide sections, then I would urge you to go back and read that section if you skipped it.
Now, I know it's not the sexiest of titles, nor the most glamorous of subjects, but good typography is the strength to which I play all the time. Balloon placement continually causes me headaches, but I do take comfort in nicely formed blocks of text.
You may think you know about setting type, but you don't -- I still learn new things about typography almost daily and I've been designing for print since 1994. Perhaps you don't think it's important, but one of the most glaring things I see in amateur lettering, one of the things that most quickly and obviously lets down sample lettering posted for crits on Digital Webbing, is bad typesetting.
Here endeth the moan.
I know what you're thinking…
Harking back to the Non-Standard Balloons section, Emperor requested a quick how-to on telepathic balloons. As Nate Piekos notes in his excellent Grammar and Tradition article (which you have read, haven't you?), many letterers now make up a balloon style for telepathic speech, but a classic, old-school ballon can be achieved as follows:
Start with a normal thought balloon, as previously described in the Non-Standard Balloons section. Draw a thin, pointy black triangle with the Pen tool:
Duplicate this triangle twice.
(You can copy & paste, or you can hold the ALT key down and drag with the Selection tool. If you hold down SHIFT as well, then the drag direction is constrained to vertical or horizontal. Try it -- it's easier to understand than it is to explain. Note that if you use the ALT-drag method to copy, you must release the mouse button before the ALT key, or the operation will simply move the original object.)
Now use the Offset Path function that we previously used when talking about Breakout Balloons, but set the value to 1pt (remember, you can input the value in points and that you need to manually change 'Joins' to 'Round'):
As with the breakout balloons, the result looks like a mess:
Change the Fill to white and group the shape with the original black triangles:
Rotate the the grouped shape by about 45° (hold down the SHIFT key to constrain the rotation to exact angles if you want precisely 45°):
And start adding your your pointers to each corner:
Until you're done.
Obviously, by its very nature, a lot of these balloons represent communication by someone not physically present in the scene, in which case these balloons just float as they are, with no tails.
Sometimes, however, it is necessary to indicate the 'speaker', in the case of telepathic 'conversations' for example, in which case the balloon will usually take a zig-zag tail, as discussed in the most recent Sunday Surgery:
Cheers!
Jim
Do you need to hand draw them? I might be jumping the gun and you are going to cover this later, but can't you use the breath marks from you fonts and jiggle them about a bit? Because breath marks usually don't have a uniform length but tend to have an even thickness.
ReplyDeleteI am also unsure what that'd look like against a colour background as the white fill obviously breaks out of the bubble through the "gaps" but I suppose you'd have to judge this by eye. It might be why this has fallen out of favour I suppose ;)
Just thought I'd provide you with the perspective of someone who is intrigued by the process but is at (or below) the bottom rung on competence (well I was before reading your guides) ;)
Good thoughts all. I tried it with several different breath marks originally, but they didn't seem to work. It may well be that I haven't tried the right font yet!
ReplyDeleteAnd you're quite right about the white offset on the pointy-bits… I when I roughed out the notes I meant to have an additional white outer stroke to unify the elements on the page, but somehow the note failed to make it into the finished piece. I'll revise the article when I get a few minutes -- good catch!